Australia

Australia and New Zealand · AUS

Australia lands more than a dozen active submarine cables spanning routes to Asia, the Pacific, and the Middle East — a diverse international network underpinned by a handful of well-documented landing points near Sydney.

Connectivity at a glance

Cable systems
16active
Landing points
4
Resilience score
100

Cable systems serving Australia

CableStatusReady for serviceLengthDesign capacity
Oman Australia CableactiveSeptember 2022 }}9,800 km39 Tbit/s
Coral Sea Cable System (CS²)activeFebruary 20204,700 km40 Tbit/s total (four fibre pairs)
Australia Singapore CableactiveSeptember 201860 Tbit/s
Pipe Pacific Cable (PPC-1)activeAugust 20092.56 Tbit/s
Gondwana-1active2008 }}
Australia–Japan Cable (AJC)active2001 }}640&nbsp;gbit/s (2001)<br/>1000 gbit/s (2008)<br/> >4000 gbit/s (2013)
Southern Cross Cableactive2000>20&nbsp;Tbit/s (Jan 2020, based on 100G+ Technology)
ACC-1active
AISactive
ANZAC Cable Systemactive
ANZCANactive
APNGactive
Hawaikiactive
PacRimWestactive
TASMAN 1active
TASMAN 2active

Landing points

A well-connected continent

Australia sits at the southern edge of the Asia-Pacific cable network and serves as a critical anchor point for routes running north to Japan and Southeast Asia, east across the Pacific toward the United States, and west through the Indian Ocean to the Middle East and beyond. With more than fifteen active cable systems listed on the register, the country is among the better-served nations in the region by raw cable count.

The mix of systems reflects decades of incremental investment. Older cables such as the Southern Cross Cable and the Australia–Japan Cable, which entered service around the turn of the century, established the core transpacific and trans-Tasman corridors. Later additions — including the Australia Singapore Cable, ready for service in 2018, and the Oman Australia Cable, which spans roughly 9,800 kilometres and arrived in 2022 — have extended diversity westward and reduced reliance on routes that transit through Southeast Asian hub nodes.

Route diversity and resilience

The breadth of destinations served tells a more useful story than cable count alone. Australia maintains active links toward at least four distinct geographic corridors: the trans-Tasman routes served by TASMAN 1, TASMAN 2, and the ANZAC Cable System; northward paths to Japan, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands through systems including AJC, the Australia Singapore Cable, PPC-1, and APNG; a westward Indian Ocean route via the Oman Australia Cable; and transpacific connections through Southern Cross and Hawaiki. That spread means a fault on any single route is unlikely to sever Australia's international capacity outright.

Concentration risk has not disappeared, however. Several of the documented landing points cluster around Sydney — Narrabeen Beach, Oxford Falls, and Paddington — meaning a localised event in that corridor could affect multiple cable systems simultaneously. The degree to which cables physically separate after landfall is a key factor in assessing true resilience, and that detail varies by system.

Geography as constraint and opportunity

Australia's isolation is both the challenge and the justification for its cable investment. There are no terrestrial neighbours and no overland transit options; every international bit travels by sea or satellite. That dependency has driven sustained cable-building activity and kept the country attentive to route diversity in ways that landlocked or well-interconnected nations rarely need to be. The result is a submarine cable portfolio that, while still evolving, reflects a genuine awareness of the infrastructure risks that geographic isolation imposes.